PAPER C
MINUTES OF RYDE TOWN COUNCIL’S PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND
REGENERATION COMMITTEE HELD ON TUESDAY 27 OCTOBER 2020 AT 4.00PM VIA
THE ZOOM VIDEO MEETING FACILITY AND STREAMED LIVE VIA YOUTUBE
Members Present:
Cllr Diana Conyers (Chair), Cllr Adrian Axford, Cllr Charles Chapman,
Cllr Michael Lilley, Cllr Malcolm Ross and Cllr Ian Stephens
Also in Attendance: Jon Baker (Committees Coordinator), Chris Turvey (Planning Clerk)
PUBLIC QUESTIONS
Prior to the meeting, a written question was received via email from Mrs Jenny Wade of Ryde
regarding the Pennyfeathers Housing development. She wanted to know: (i) whether the
additional applications for Phasing Plans and Reserved Matters had been submitted following a
suggestion from the developer’s agent in July 2020 that they would be applied for in September
2020; and (ii) whether rumours that Hepburns Planning Consultancy was no longer the agent
were true. It was agreed that the question would be addressed during Agenda Item 9 (Meeting
Housing Needs), minute reference 145/20.
137/20 APOLOGIES
Apologies were received from Cllr Henry Adams and Cllr Phil Jordan
138/20 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
None declared.
139/20 REQUESTS FOR DISPENSATIONS
None requested.
140/20 MINUTES
The minutes to the previous meeting held on 6 October 2020 were reviewed.
RESOLVED:
THAT the Minutes of the meeting held on 6 October 2020 were approved as a
true and accurate record and would be signed off by the Chair following the
meeting
The following updates were provided on issues raised at the meeting of 6 October
2020:
C - 1
i. Oakfield Primary School. It was noted that there continued to be issues around the
school with regard to children and parents walking to the school either from
Marlborough Road, East Hill Road or High Park Road. Cllr Lilley reported that there
would be a meeting between the School’s Headteacher, the Board of Governors
and the local member, arranged by the Chair of the Schools Board of Governors
to discuss a way forward. Feedback from the meeting would be provided to Ryde
Town Council and a letter from the Town Council would then be sent to the Isle of
Wight Council and Island Roads with a request to look into the matter.
ii. Bartletts Farm Planning Application. This had not been picked up by Ryde Town
Council officers as it was listed as an application for Brading and St Helens ward.
It was noted that the ward was on the boundary and that any future applications
should be checked to ensure its ward location was listed correctly.
iii. Harcourt Sands. The Town Council had yet to hear from the Health and Safety
Executive. Officers would endeavour to chase for a response by the next meeting.
141/20
MEMBER QUESTIONS
None were received.
142/20
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
The following Planning Applications were then considered by the
committee:
i.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: 24 Westwood Road, Ryde, PO33 3BJ
Proposal: Outline for proposed pair of semi-detached bungalows with vehicular
accesses and parking
Island Roads had raised objections on the grounds of road safety owing to the
design of the road junction with Queens Road as being unacceptable due to safe
access. Visibility for vehicle drivers using the junction was also insufficient.
At the time of the meeting, four objections had been submitted by members of the
public who considered the lane which was intended as the main access for the two
proposed houses to be unsuitable as a main access to the highway network.
Members noted that Island Roads had lodged an objection but were becoming
increasingly concerned that the Isle of Wight Council had on various applications in
the past ignored them and proceeded to approve an application.
The committee was advised however that there needed to be clear evidence that
this was happening on a regular basis in order to raise any objection to the Isle of
Wight Council.
It was agreed that officers would investigate the matter and try to establish some
previous examples in order to raise objections to the Head of the IWC’s Planning,
the IWC’s Planning Committee Chair and the Cabinet Member for Planning and
Housing.
C - 2
The Chair also advised members that she would in her capacity as the Chair of the
Isle of Wight Association of Local Councils (IWALC), propose at the next IWALC
meeting that they could investigate if this was an issue being experienced across
the Island. Any letter of objection by Ryde Town Council could also be copied to
IWALC.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council objected to the application on the grounds outlined
in the Island Roads report, namely:
a)
Generation of traffic onto the public highway. This would create a
significant increase in vehicular traffic entering and leaving the public
highway through the junction of Westwood Drive with Queens Roads.
This would be contrary to Policy DM2
(Design Quality for New
Development) and DM17 (Sustainable Travel) of the Isle of Wight Core
Strategy
b)
Standing vehicles in Highway - Development would attract standing
vehicles on the highway at Queens Road which would interrupt the free
flow of traffic adding to the hazards of road users and therefore be
contrary to Policy DM2 (Design Quality for New Development) of the Isle
of Wight Core Strategy
c)
Inadequate Fire Access and Refuse Collection Access - The access
would be unable to serve the proposed development by reason of the
inadequacy of Westwood Drive to allow access and working area for
the Fire Service and Refuse Collection Service. The proposal is
therefore considered to be contrary to policy DM2 (Design Quality for
New Development) of the Isle of Wight Core Strategy.
d)
Inadequate Parking Area - Inadequate space to enable vehicles to park
in a satisfactory and safe manner and therefore the interests of road
safety are compromised. It is therefore inconsistent with the guidelines
set out by the Local Planning Authority in Policy DM2 (Design Quality
for New Development) of the Isle of Wight Core Strategy.
e)
Inadequate Access Visibility - Accesses are unsatisfactory to serve the
proposed development by reason of unacceptable visibility and would
therefore be contrary to Policy DM2
(Design Quality for New
Development) of the Isle of Wight Core Strategy
ii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde East
Location: 34 & 36 Grasmere Avenue, Ryde, PO33 1NU
Proposal: Formation of vehicle crossovers and hardstanding (revised scheme)
Members noted that this was a revised application for a scheme which had
previously been refused. The main difference between this application and the
previous was a small amount of tarmac was to be removed in order to lessen the
impact of the loss of the grass between the footpath and the adjoining properties.
C - 3
Island Roads had made some recommendations which they felt would be essential
to make the revised scheme acceptable, although at the time of the meeting, nothing
had been submitted from the applicant to address their concerns. The application
had also been objected to by several local residents.
The previous application, 20/00325/HOU , had been advertised by the Isle of Wight
Council on 5 June 2020. It had attracted a great deal of opposition and been
opposed by Ryde Town Council at its meeting on 14 July 2020.
The committee were of the opinion that the revised scheme still did not address the
reasons for the first refusal in that it would have a serious adverse effect on the
character and context of the area contrary to the aims of Policies SP1 (Spatial
Strategy) and DM2 (Design Quality for New Development) of the Island Plan Core
Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council objected to the application on the following
grounds:
i. The application was contrary to Policies SP1 (Spatial Strategy) and DM2
(Design Quality for New Development) of the Island Plan Core Strategy
and the National Planning Policy Framework.
ii. The concerns raised by Island Roads had not been addressed by the
applicant.
iii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Binstead And Fishbourne
Location: Quarrhurst, Quarr Road, Binstead, Ryde, PO33 4EL
Proposal: Demolition of dwelling; Proposed replacement dwelling with detached
garage and detached ancillary amenity pool house building
Members were advised that the proposed application included a HUF House which
was a prefabricated building system from Germany and that the construction time
would usually be less than one month. It was noted that the application would
replace a withdrawn application for a much bigger scheme that had been removed
by the applicant.
Members were advised that the building which was to be demolished was not listed
and was not situated in a conservation area. There had been no objections from any
local residents and none from the various consultee agencies.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
iv.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde East
Location: 30 Somerset Road, Ryde, PO33 1BU
Proposal: Proposed rear and side extension including alterations
C - 4
Members were advised that earlier on the day of the meeting, the Planning Clerk
had noticed that on the Isle of Wight Council’s website there was an absence of
various documents to support the application and members questioned whether the
consultation time should be extended in order to allow for any further
representations to be received.
It was noted however that there had been no objections from local residents or
relevant statutory consultees to date.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
v.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde East
Location: 117 Great Preston Road, Ryde, PO33 1DB
Proposal: Demolition of outbuilding; proposed building forming annexed
accommodation
It was noted that Island Roads recommended approval with no concerns raised. The
annexed accommodation was also in line with the proposals outlined in the draft
Island Planning Strategy where such applications were encouraged.
Members were happy to support the application on the understanding that the
annexed accommodation would remain as part of the main property.
RESOLVED:
THAT, subject to the annexed accommodation remaining as part of the main
property, Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
vi.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: 12 Esplanade, Ryde, PO33 2DY
Proposal: Change of use from Arcade (Sui Generis) to Pool Hall and Takeaway (Sui
Generis); Internal alterations.
Members were reminded that the premises licence application for the proposed Pool
Hall, which was applied for ahead of the planning application, was supported in full
by the Committee at its meeting on 15 September 2020.
It was noted that members were again pleased to show their support for such a
venture that would provide much needed local and tourist indoor entertainment on
a year round basis in such a high profile area in the town.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
C - 5
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: 12 Esplanade, Ryde, PO33 2DY
Proposal: Listed Building Consent for internal alterations to create a kitchen, extend
the gents toilets and change the office into a ladies toilet
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
The applications below had been considered under delegated powers by the Chair and
Planning Clerk and they proposed that no objections be raised:
i.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Binstead And Fishbourne
Location: 28 Arnold Road, Binstead, Ryde, PO33 3RJ
Proposal: Proposed single storey extension; alterations and outbuilding
ii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North East
Location: 31 West Hill Road, Ryde, PO33 1LG
Proposal: Demolition of conservatory; Proposed alterations and single storey rear
extension including Juliet balcony at first floor level on rear elevation (revised
scheme)
iii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: Former Ryde Conservative Club, 8 Lind Street, Ryde, PO33 2NQ
Proposal: Variation of condition 2 on P/01223/18 to allow revised internal layout and
omission of garage
iv.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: Former Ryde Conservative Club, 8 Lind Street, Ryde, PO33 2NQ
Proposal: Variation of condition 2 on P/01224/18 to allow revised internal layout and
omission of garage
v.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Binstead And Fishbourne
Location: 4 Wykeham Close, Binstead, Ryde, PO33 3ST
Proposal: Proposed extension on front elevation and cladding (revised scheme)
vi.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde West
Location: Melody, 9 Trafalgar Drive, Binstead, Ryde, PO33 3QW
Proposal: Proposed alterations and single storey rear extension; loft conversion;
single storey extension to garage to form workshop (revised plans) (readvertised
application)
C - 6
Parish(es): Ryde
Ward(s): Ryde North East
Location: 9 The Strand, Ryde, PO33 1JD
Proposal: Proposed alterations to boundary wall to provide gated vehicular access
onto the Esplanade
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North East
Location: 9 The Strand, Ryde, PO33 1JD
Proposal: Listed Building Consent for proposed alterations to boundary
wall to
provide gated vehicular access onto the Esplanade
RESOLVED:
THAT the above eight applications were agreed with no objections.
143/20
DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNCIL
Members noted the following decisions.
PLANNING DECISIONS
1. APPLICATIONS APPROVED
i.
Location: Macquarrie Quarr Road, Binstead, Ryde, PO33 4EL
Proposal: Retention of fencing and gates (Revised Plans)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 28/09/2020
Ryde Town Council objected to the application due to the unsympathetic nature
of the metal galvanised type fence combined with the planting of nonindigenous
trees that were not in keeping with the AONB.
ii.
Location: Beachwood Quarr Road, Binstead, Ryde, PO33 4EL
Proposal: Retention of fencing and gates (Revised Plans)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 28/09/2020
Ryde Town Council objected to the application due to the unsympathetic nature
of the metal galvanised type fence combined with the planting of nonindigenous
trees that were not in keeping with the AONB.
iii.
Location: Land Rear of Downs View and Redridge House Rosemary Lane Ryde
Proposal: TC and TD Cupressus Macrocarpa trees situated as detailed in the
application are to have their crowns overhanging neighbouring gardens by 2 to
3 metres. All reductions are to be to string growth points at least one third the
diameter of the adjacent pruning point.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Havenstreet, Ashey And Haylands
Decision Date: 29/09/2020
C - 7
iv.
Location: 10 Vernon Square Ryde Isle of Wight PO33 2JG
Proposal: Replacement bay windows on front elevation
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 05/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to this application
v.
Location: 61 Spencer Road, Ryde, PO33 3AF
Proposal: The oak tree situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to
near ground level.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North West
Decision Date: 07/10/2020
vi.
Location: 11 East Street Ryde, PO33 1JP
Proposal: Continued use of property as community arts centre and cafe; including
two artist studios; exhibition gallery and community gallery
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 13/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to this application
vii.
Location: 11 East Street Ryde, PO33 1JP
Proposal: Non-illuminated projecting sign and 2 fascia signs
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 13/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to this application
2. APPLICATIONS REFUSED
Location: 40 Great Preston Road, Ryde, PO33 1EF
Proposal: Demolition of garage; proposed two storey side extension; first floor
rear extension; loft conversion including alterations to existing roof line.
Decision Date: 06/10/2020
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde South
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to this application
Location: Old Wychwood Quarr Hill Binstead Ryde, PO33 4EH
Proposal: Proposed construction of new bungalow with parking
Decision Date: 12/10/2020
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Ryde Town Council support this application subject to the confirmation by way
of a tree report that no trees will be adversely affected by the proposed dwelling
C - 8
It was noted that there were two applications which Ryde Town Council had objected
to and conversely, one application which was refused that Ryde Town Council had
supported.
RESOLVED:
THAT the decisions taken by the Isle of Wight Council since the last Ryde Town
Council Planning Committee meeting be noted.
144/20
PAVEMENT PARKING: OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
The Chair advised members that the Town Council had, along with other Town and
Parish Councils, been made aware of a government consultation initiative, inviting
comments on the proposed options for change with regard to the increasing problems
around the parking of vehicles on pavements.
In order for the government to better understand the wide range of issues and problems
being encountered, the Department for Transport had outlined three main options:
• Option 1 - Ongoing work to improve the current enforcement process, under which
local authorities can prohibit pavement parking by making Traffice Regulation
Orders (TROs) and, if they have Civil Parking Enforcement (CPE) powers, issuing
PCNs.
• Option 2 - Legislative change to allow local authorities with CPE powers to enforce
against ‘unnecessary obstruction of the pavement’. At present only the Police have
this power.
• Option 3 - Legislative change to introduce a London-style pavement parking
prohibition throughout England (London had banned all pavement parking since
1974) except on streets which the local authority designates as exempt.
Any other alternative proposals would also be welcomed. Consultees are requested to
respond by completing an online questionnaire.
Members were of the opinion that as Ryde had large areas of narrow pavements, the
issue of pavement parking had become a problem in some areas, creating difficulties
for people to negotiate around parked cars, particularly those with physical disabilities.
The general opinion was that some change is needed and Option 2 and 3 were
discussed. It was agreed that the Chair would explore the options further and draft a
response for consideration at the next meeting.
145/20 MEETING HOUSING NEEDS
The Committee was reminded of the public question which was raised regarding the
Pennyfeathers Phasing Plans and Reserved Matters applications that were anticipated
to be received during September 2020. The Chair stated that, although Ryde Town
Council had been informed by the developer’s agent that they hoped to submit the
applications by the original deadline of 1 September, they had no legal responsibility
to do so because the government had, owing to the Covid 19 pandemic, extended the
deadline for such submissions to April 2021. Regarding the rumour that Hepburns was
C - 9
no longer the agent, the Chair agreed to look into the matter and advise the questioner
accordingly.
With regard to housing needs in general, the Chair suggested that, in view of current
debates on housing needs assessment and the allocation of land for housing
purposes, the Town Council should consider its stance on these issues and what
possible action it could take to facilitate the provision of appropriate housing, especially
social housing for rent. She suggested that Vectis Housing Group should be contacted
in order to gain support and advice.
It was agreed that these issues should be referred to the working group set up to review
the Position Statement and that a meeting of the Group should be organised as soon
as possible.
It was suggested that the Isle of Wight Council’s Cabinet Member for Planning and
Housing should be invited to the next meeting in order to discuss housing and related
planning issues. It was agreed that the Chair would write a letter of invitation to the
Cabinet Member with a view to him attending the next meeting on 17 November 2020.
146/20
HIGH STREET HERITAGE ACTION ZONE (HSZAZ) UPDATE
In his absence the Chair of the HSHAZ Steering Group had circulated ahead of the
meeting an update on the project.
It was noted that there were plans for a research project, led by the University of
Southampton and funded by the Solent Local Enterprise Partnership, to examine the
impact of the pedestrianisation of the lower High Street on deliveries to businesses.
Members agreed that such a study could be useful because some businesses have
no rear delivery access. They also suggested that, since there are still a small number
of vehicles driving and parking in the zone, especially during the evening, there is a
need for further measures, such as a barrier and/or improved signage.
It was also noted an error in the research proposal. It referred to the pedestrianisation
being between Garfield Road and Cross Street. This should in fact be between Garfield
Road and Star Street.
147/20 DATE OF NEXT MEETING
RESOLVED:
THAT the next meeting of the Planning, Regeneration and Environment
Committee will be held on Tuesday, 17 November 2020 via the Zoom Video
meeting facility, at 4.00pm.
C - 10
MINUTES OF RYDE TOWN COUNCIL’S PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND
REGENERATION COMMITTEE HELD ON TUESDAY 17 NOVEMBER 2020 AT 4.00PM VIA
THE ZOOM VIDEO MEETING FACILITY AND STREAMED LIVE VIA YOUTUBE
Members Present:
Cllr Diana Conyers (Chair), Cllr Henry Adams, Cllr Adrian Axford, Cllr
Charles Chapman, Cllr Michael Lilley, Cllr Phil Jordan, Cllr Malcolm
Ross and Cllr Ian Stephens
Also in Attendance: Jon Baker (Committees Coordinator), Chris Turvey (Planning Clerk)
PUBLIC QUESTIONS
Prior to the meeting, a written question was received from Mrs Jenny Wade, regarding the
difficulty of considering the revised West Acre Park planning application (20/01061/FUL), given
the several different proposals put forward for the Westridge Cross junction and further delays
in the publication of the Island Roads infrastructure report
(commissioned by the Ryde
Regeneration Working Group), which is now not expected to be ready until Christmas.
The Chair advised that the application would be discussed later in the meeting and her question
would be addressed via a written response.
148/20 APOLOGIES
None received
149/20 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
None declared.
150/20 REQUESTS FOR DISPENSATIONS
None requested.
151/20 MINUTES
The minutes to the previous meeting held on 27 October 2020 were reviewed.
RESOLVED:
THAT the Minutes of the meeting held on 27 October 2020 were approved as a
true and accurate record and would be signed off by the Chair following the
meeting
C - 11
The following points arising from the Minutes were noted:
i. Pennyfeathers - Members were advised that Hepburns Planning Consultancy
were still the agents for the Pennyfeathers developers.
ii. Meeting on 8 December 2020 - Cllr Barry Abraham, the Isle of Wight Cabinet
Member for Planning and Housing was unable to attend the present meeting but
would be attending the Planning, Regeneration and Environment Committee
meeting on Tuesday, 8 December 2020.
iii. Harcourt Sands - The IW Councillor for Seaview and Nettlestone ward had
advised that the concerns expressed by members were being addressed.
152/20
MEMBER QUESTIONS
None were received.
153/20
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
The following Planning Applications were then considered by all members of the
committee:
i.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde East
Location: Land South of Appley Road North of Bullen Road and East of Hope
Road (West Acre Park) Ryde
Proposal: Demolition of agricultural buildings and the garage to No
125
Marlborough Road; Proposed development consisting of 475 new dwellings
(single and two storey dwellings (inclusive of 35% affordable housing) and
inclusive of the conversion of the Coach House into pair of semi-detached
dwellings; (leading to a net gain of 474 dwellings), single storey café and two
storey doctors surgery and B1 office space with associated site infrastructure
(inclusive of roads, parking, photovoltaic pergolas, garages, bin and bikes stores,
below ground foul waste pump, electric substations, surface water detention
basins and swales, landscape and ecological mitigations and net biodiversity
enhancements); Proposed vehicular accesses off Bullen Road and Appley Road;
Proposed public open spaces, Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace and
Allotments; Proposed three public rights of way; Proposed access, parking and
turning for No 125 Marlborough Road and associated highways improvements
(Revised plans, revised drainage strategy and flood risk, additional highway
technical note and updated appendix S to highway chapter of environmental
statement)(readvertised application)
It was noted that that additional comments had been received from the IWC’s
Ecology Officer and that their concerns had now been addressed. The Woodland
Trust had also stated that the concerns that they had raised had also been
addressed and had subsequently removed their objection.
With regard to the seven houses that were located on a flood zone within Phase
D of the development identified by the Environment Agency, these had been
relocated to Phase B.
C - 12
Members were also advised that concerns received previously from Island Roads
around road, footpath designs and road junctions, had seen revised plans
submitted. The local Police Authority had also stated that their concerns had been
addressed.
Whilst Members noted these points, they were still of the opinion that the original
objections lodged to the Isle of Wight Council on 11 September 2020 should
remain.
There was also an additional concern that the proposed multi user access to
West Acre Park at Marlborough Road was unsuitable for pedestrians and cyclists
owing to safety issues and that its development would compromise the local
street scene as well as that of the entrance to Salisbury Road, having a
detrimental effect on the residents.
RESOLVED:
THAT the objections submitted on 11 September 2020 remain and that an
additional objection is raised, namely:
Ryde Town Council objects owing to the proposed revisions to the access
to the site are unsafe and compromise the street scene of Marlborough
Road and the access to Salisbury Road and will have a detrimental effect
on the local amenity.
ii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde East
Location: 117 Great Preston Road, Ryde, PO33 1DB
Proposal: Demolition of outbuilding; proposed building forming annexed
accommodation(revised plans)(readvertised application)
Members were advised that this was a revised application with one change. This
was to reduce the overall number of bedrooms on the site to match what was
there originally. This would help mitigate the issues raised by Natural England
regarding foul drainage.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council had no objections to the application
iii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde South
Location: 1 Warwick Street, Ryde, PO33 2HY
Proposal: Proposed two storey rear extension and single storey front extension.
The local ward Member advised the committee that he had received no
objections from local residents.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council had no objections to the application
C - 13
iv.
Parish(es): Nettlestone And Seaview
Ward(s): Nettlestone And Seaview
Location: Land North of Woodland Close and Adjacent Cedar Lodge and
Thornton Cottage, Puckpool Hill, Seaview
Proposal: Outline for up to 50 residential dwellings (with details of access),
creation of a new access off Puckpool Hill, and provision of public open space,
landscaping and associated works.
Whilst this site was located within the Nettlestone and Seaview Ward, it was
considered appropriate to comment on it is on the border of Ryde East Ward and
would impact on its residents. Nettlestone and Seaview Parish Council had been
contacted and indicated they would welcome our comments.
It was noted that Island Roads had requested additional information around
carriageway and footway but considered that the development would not have a
significant impact on traffic at the Marlborough Road/Appley Road junction. It was
also noted that the developers justified complaints that the development was in
a rural area on the grounds that it was an extension of Ryde.
Members were concerned to note that there would be no provision of affordable
housing. The rational for this was supported by a viability study that stated that
including affordable housing in the scheme would make it unfeasible. However,
this was disputed by the Town Council because the valuation assessments were
based on property values for an outline scheme and should be reviewed when
reserved matters are submitted to accurately assess what type and value of
housing would be on the site. In addition, comparisons in house prices used were
not like for like, further skewing the potential value of property on the site.
The proposed West Acre Park site nearby would give a much better indication of
current house values than the comparisons used in the study for Puckpool Hill.
Also and no allowance had been made for the increase in property prices for the
duration of the development. The nearby site at Westridge Farm, however
unpopular, is being delivered and has managed to provide a full affordable house
quota. If the Puckpool development were to escape the imposition of affordable
housing it would be an unlevel playing field and give them a great commercial
advantage.
Members were extremely concerned that the entrance and exit to the site was
dangerous as there was no capacity to create a footpath for pedestrians to walk
in and out of it. This would therefore prejudice homeowners without the use of a
motor vehicles. They also disputed the claims made by Island Roads that should
the development proceed it would have no significant impact on the increase in
traffic. This was a concern owing to the location of Oakfield Primary School and
the safety of its pupils walking to school.
Other objections raised were overdevelopment, the further loss of green space
(which is in contradiction of the Ryde Place Plan which identified a lack of green
space within the town) and the location of the development outside the settlement
boundary.
C - 14
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council objects to the application on the following
grounds:
a) No provision for affordable housing.
b) No infrastructure to address an increase in traffic.
c) No pedestrian access to the site, which prejudices potential home
owners without access to motor vehicles.
d) The site is outside of the Ryde Settlement Boundary
e) Further overdevelopment of Ryde.
f) Loss of green space
The applications below were considered under delegated powers by the Chair and
Planning Clerk and they proposed the following:
i.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Havenstreet, Ashey And Haylands
Location: 98 Ashey Road, Ryde, PO33 2UZ
Proposal: Proposed single storey rear extension
ii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Havenstreet, Ashey And Haylands
Location: 4 Southfield Gardens, Ryde, PO33 3EE
Proposal: Proposed two storey side extension
iii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: 16 Northwood Drive, Ryde, PO33 3AQ
Proposal: Alterations and conversion of garage to form additional
living
accommodation.
RESOLVED:
THAT the above three applications were agreed with no objections.
154/20
LICENCING APPLICATIONS
The following Licencing applications were considered
i. Application for a Premises Licence - Grace’s bakery, 178 High Street - Ryde
Members wished to place on record their full support for this application. Owing
to difficult times it was encouraging to see businesses looking at new ways of
remaining open.
C - 15
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council had no objections to the application
ii. Application for a Premises Licence - Craft, 9 Esplanade, Ryde - Ref
Members also wished to place on record their full support for this application,
welcoming more diverse places for residents and visitors to dine out.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council had no objections to the application
155/20
DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNCIL
Members noted the following decisions.
PLANNING DECISIONS
1. APPLICATIONS APPROVED
i.
Location: Gloucester House, 18 St Thomas Street, Ryde, PO33 2DL
Proposal: Sycamore situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to near
ground levelHorse chestnut situated as detailed in the application is to have the
crown reduced by thirty percent of its current crown capacity. All the pruning
cuts are to be to strong growth points that are at least one third the diameter of
the adjacent pruning point. The reduction will leave the tree with a natural form.
London Plane situated as detailed in the application is to have the crown
reduced by thirty percent of its current crown capacity. All the pruning cuts are
to be to strong growth points that are at least one third the diameter of the
adjacent pruning point. The reduction will leave the tree with a natural form.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North West
Decision Date: 19/10/2020
ii.
Location: Rear Of 3 And 5 Marina Avenue Appley Lane Ryde
Proposal:T1; Common Ash - Remove dead wood, end weight reduction (reduce
large lateral southern facing limb by 2 -2.5m), raise low canopy (crown lift 3m
off building).T2; Common Ash - Remove dead wood
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde East
Decision Date: 19/10/2020
iii.
Location: 1 Grasmere Avenue Ryde, PO33 1NU
Proposal: Proposed two storey extension and porch (revised scheme)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde East
Decision Date: 22/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
C - 16
iv.
Location: 17 Melville Street, Ryde, PO33 2AF
Proposal: Installation of railings, gate and walls
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 26/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
v.
Location: 17 Melville Street, Ryde, PO33 2AF
Proposal: Listed Building Consent for installation of railings, gate and walls
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 26/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
vi.
Location: Park House 72 West Hill, Road Ryde, PO33 1LW
Proposal: T1 and 2; (TPO 28 and 29) Lime trees - situated as detailed in the
Application are to be pollarded to previous pollard points.T3; (TPO 27) Lime -
situated as detailed in the application is to have the coppice regrowth from the
stump removed. Sycamore and Buddleia - the sycamore and buddleia saplings
detailed in the application are to be removed.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 28/10/2020
vii.
Location: 2 Ashey Place, Ryde, PO33 2WA
Proposal: Proposed single storey rear flat roofed extension; replacement garden
outbuilding
Parish: Ryde Ward: Havenstreet, Ashey And Haylands
Decision Date: 29/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
viii.
Location: Sumara, Grove Road, Ryde, PO33 3LH
Proposal: Proposed single storey rear extension
Parish: Ryde Ward: Havenstreet, Ashey And Haylands
Decision Date: 30/10/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
ix.
Location: 1 Kentstone Court Binstead Road Ryde, PO33 3DF
Proposal: T1 Field maple situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to
near ground level.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 02/11/2020
C - 17
Location: 70 Spencer Road Ryde, PO33 3AH
Proposal: T1; Yew situated as detailed in the application is to have the height
reduced by 50% T2; Cypress hedge situated as detailed in the application is to
be trimmed on the western side.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North West
Decision Date: 02/11/2020
2. APPLICATIONS REFUSED
i.
Location: Avalon Appley Rise Ryde, PO33 1LE
Proposal: Lawful Development Certificate for proposed replacement garage
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 04/11/2020
No consultation required owing to the application was for a lawful development
certificate
ii.
Location: 24 Westwood Road Ryde, PO33 3BJ
Proposal: Outline for proposed pair of semi-detached bungalows with vehicular
accesses and parking
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North West
Decision Date: 06/11/2020
Ryde Town Council objected to the application on the grounds outlined in the
Island Roads report, namely:
a) Generation of traffic onto the public highway. This would create a
significant increase in vehicular traffic entering and leaving the public
highway through the junction of Westwood Drive with Queens Roads. This
would be contrary to Policy DM2 (Design Quality for New Development)
and DM17 (Sustainable Travel) of the Isle of Wight Core Strategy
b) Standing vehicles in Highway
- Development would attract standing
vehicles on the highway at Queens Road which would interrupt the free
flow of traffic adding to the hazards of road users and therefore be contrary
to Policy DM2 (Design Quality for New Development) of the Isle of Wight
Core Strategy
c)
Inadequate Fire Access and Refuse Collection Access - The access would
be unable to serve the proposed development by reason of the inadequacy
of Westwood Drive to allow access and working area for the Fire Service
and Refuse Collection Service. The proposal is therefore considered to be
contrary to policy DM2 (Design Quality for New Development) of the Isle
of Wight Core Strategy.
C - 18
d) Inadequate Parking Area - Inadequate space to enable vehicles to park in
a satisfactory and safe manner and therefore the interests of road safety
are compromised. It is therefore inconsistent with the guidelines set out by
the Local Planning Authority in Policy DM2 (Design Quality for New
Development) of the Isle of Wight Core Strategy.
e) Inadequate Access Visibility - Accesses are unsatisfactory to serve the
proposed development by reason of unacceptable visibility and would
therefore be contrary to Policy DM2 (Design Quality for New Development)
of the Isle of Wight Core Strategy
RESOLVED:
THAT the decisions taken by the Isle of Wight Council since the last Ryde Town
Council Planning Committee meeting be noted.
156/20
RYDE INTERCHANGE CYCLEWAY
The Committee were advised that the revised plans for the Interchange would include
an uncovered walk and cycle along the Pier and a cycleway along the Esplanade to
Appley. It was suggested that in order to involve the cycling community, Cycleway
should be approached to look at forming a cycling working group which could also
involve local cycle businesses. This would enable engagement between the Isle of
Wight Council and a key stakeholder.
On the wider changes to the Interchange, the committee felt strongly that such a
major change to a significant area of the town must have a heavy influence from the
Town Council, and that any input into the consultation process for the three year
project must be taken into account for the benefit of Ryde and its residents. The
Planning, Regeneration and Environment Officer would therefore contact the Isle of
Wight Councils Highways and Transport Manager in order to ensure that Ryde Town
Council would play a major part in the project.
It was noted that there were also plans for a small sub group of the Ryde
Regeneration Working Group to be involved with overlooking the three year project,
and any news would be fed back to the Planning, Regeneration and Environment
Committee.
It was also noted that the Ryde Place Plan recommended that a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) between the Town Council and all the major travel operators
be pursued. All operators have agreed in principle and such an MoU would benefit all
parties.
157/20 PAVEMENT PARKING - RTC RESPONSE
At the previous meeting the Chair had advised members that all primary, town and
parish councils had been invited to contribute to a government consultation on the
proposed legislative change around vehicles parking on pavements.
Three options were proposed: support ongoing work to improve the current
enforcement process (option 1), allow local authorities with civil parking enforcement
C - 19
powers to enforce against unnecessary pavement parking in order to take pressure
off the police (option 2) or a complete ban in England (except on streets which the
local authority designates as exempt) as has been the case in London since 1974
(option 3).
Members discussed a draft response, which favoured Option 3. There was a wide
discussion around the merits of options 2 and 3. Whilst option 3 made it clear that
unless a road had been designated exempt, no pavement parking would be
permitted. This may prevent parking which was not considered to be an unnecessary
obstruction of the pavement and divert vehicles onto off street parking which was
already in short supply. However, there was also the opinion that a blanket ban would
on balance protect those pedestrians who had problems with sight and other physical
disabilities as make the legislation the same for all motorists. It was eventually
decided to support Option 3.
RESOLVED:
THAT Option 3 be supported and the draft response submitted in its current
form.
158/20
POSITION STATEMENT REVIEW GROUP
The Chair gave a brief verbal report on the first meeting of the Position Statement
Review Group, which was held the previous day. A written report would be submitted
to the Committee’s at the next meeting. The next meeting of the Review Group would
be on Monday 7 December.
The draft notes to the meeting held on 16 November 2020 is attached at the end of
these minutes as an appendix. These will be approved at the next meeting of the
Position Statement Review Group.
159/20
HIGH STREET HERITAGE ACTION ZONE (HSZAZ) UPDATE
The Chair of the HSZAZ Steering Group (Cllr Jordan) advised that himself, Cllr Ross,
Cllr Chapman and Mike Fitt had visited the Co-Op Square in Anglesea Street in order
to assess its potential in making aesthetic improvements.
The Shop Front Design Code was now in its initial stages and would be rolled out in
full in 2021.
The Steering Group was now looking at putting in place a physical barrier at the
entrance to the Lower High Street Pedestrianisation Zone in order to deter vehicles
driving and parking in the that part of the town.
160/20
DATE OF NEXT MEETING
RESOLVED:
THAT the next meeting of the Planning, Regeneration and Environment
Committee will be held on Tuesday, 8 December 2020 via the Zoom Video
meeting facility, at 4.00pm.
C - 20
APPENDIX
NOTES OF RYDE TOWN COUNCIL’S POSITION STATEMENT WORKING GROUP HELD
ON MONDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2020 AT 2.00PM VIA THE ZOOM VIDEO FACILITY
Members Present:
Cllr Diana Conyers (Chair), Cllr Phil Jordan, Cllr Karen Lucioni, Cllr
Malcolm Ross and Cllr Ian Stephens
Also in Attendance: Jon Baker (Committees Coordinator), Chris Turvey (Planning Clerk)
1/20
APOLOGIES
None
2/20
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
None declared.
3/20
TERMS OF REFERENCE
It was agreed that the Terms of Reference would be set out as follows
“To review the status and content of the Position
Statement
(PS) in the light of changes in
circumstances over the previous two years”
4/20
WHY A REVIEW IS NECESSARY
Members discussed the initial thoughts from the Chair which was circulated as a small
report prior to the meeting.
The Position Statement was created in 2018, with the final version approved in January
2019 and was seen primarily to be a document contributing to the IWC’s new Island
Planning Strategy as well as a policy document to assist in the consideration of
planning applications and decision making.
Its review was always intentional and with the major changes that have occurred since
its approval, such as a revised Island Planning Strategy being developed and proposed
changes to national planning legislation, the Review Group was set up to achieve this
as soon as possible.
The Position Statement contained five main areas of focus. Heritage, Economy,
Housing, Infrastructure and Environment, all with specific areas appertaining to them.
C - 21
5/20
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POSITION STATEMENT AND PLACE PLAN
Members were asked if there was a need to consider keeping the Position Statement
in light of the creation of the Ryde Place Plan and the Corporate Plan. Following
discussion it was agreed that the Position Statement should remain as an important
document in its own right and should complement the Place Plan but not be replaced
by it.
The Position Statement focused more on statutory planning matters and assists the
Town Council in responding to various planning issues and applications as well
intending to influence the Local Planning Authority (The Isle of Wight Council) in their
planning policy. It was also vital that the Town Council persistently lobbied the Isle of
Wight Council into agreeing that the Position Statement should be considered as a
Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) in order to ensure that various planning
strategies would be adhered to.
Members discussed the urgency of establishing a Memorandum of Understanding
(MoU) between RTC and the IWC which would help in pushing local issues through for
the benefit of Ryde and its residents. It was suggested that the Position Statement
should be an annex to the MoU and/or that its recognition as an SPD be part of the
MoU.
6/20
WORK PLAN
In light of the local elections scheduled for early May 2021 (Covid 19 permitting) and
the mandatory pre-election period of Purdah, the finalised document should be
completed by the end of January 2021.
The following allocations of responsibility for the five areas of revision were then
agreed:
• Heritage and the Economy - Cllr Diana Conyers
• Housing - Chris Turvey (Cllr Conyers to assist with any social housing matters)
• Infrastructure - Cllr Phil Jordan (Cllr Malcolm Ross to assist in cycling issues)
• Environment - Cllr Malcolm Ross
• Cllr Karen Lucioni would also provide input into all areas
All group members were also encouraged to provide any ideas for all areas should
they feel they have something to contribute that had perhaps not been picked up on.
7/20
DATE OF NEXT MEETING
In light for the need to finalise the review by the end of January 2021, the Group agreed
that they should meet again in early December 2020 in order to discuss their initial
ideas and suggestions. It was therefore agreed that the next meeting would be held on
Monday, 7 December 2020 at 4pm via Zoom.
C - 22
MINUTES OF RYDE TOWN COUNCIL’S PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND
REGENERATION COMMITTEE HELD ON TUESDAY 8 DECEMBER 2020 AT 2.00PM VIA
THE ZOOM VIDEO MEETING FACILITY AND STREAMED LIVE VIA YOUTUBE
Members Present:
Cllr Diana Conyers (Chair), Cllr Henry Adams, Cllr Adrian Axford, Cllr
Michael Lilley, Cllr Phil Jordan and Cllr Malcolm Ross
Also in Attendance: Cllr Barry Abraham (IWC), Jon Baker (Committees Coordinator), Chris
Turvey (Planning Clerk)
PUBLIC QUESTIONS
Prior to the meeting a written question was received from Mrs Jenny Wade of The Ryde
Society.This is appended, along with the response, to the end of these minutes and forms
part of the minutes.
A written question was also received from Mr Peter Griffiths of Home Consultancy Ltd.
This is also appended, along with the response, to the end of these minutes and forms
part of the minutes.
161/20 APOLOGIES
None received.
162/20 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
None declared.
163/20 REQUESTS FOR DISPENSATIONS
None requested.
164/20 MINUTES
The minutes to the previous meeting held on 7 November 2020 were reviewed.
Prior to approval, the following was noted: Page A-9, minute reference 156/20, the
end of the third line should refer to CYCLEwight and not Cycleway.
It was also noted that with regard to the public question received from the Ryde
Society, it should have stated that the publication of the Island Roads infrastructure
report was commissioned by Chris Ashman, the Director of Regeneration for the Isle
of Wight Council (IWC).
C - 23
RESOLVED:
THAT subject to the above being noted, the Minutes of the meeting held on 17
November 2020 were approved as a true and accurate record and would be
signed off by the Chair following the meeting
165/20
DISCUSIONS WITH THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNCIL’S CABINET MEMBER FOR
PLANNING AND HOUSING
The Isle of Wight Councils Cabinet Member for Planning and Housing attended the
meeting to discuss various matters regarding Housing and Regeneration issues
within Ryde.
The Cabinet member advised on the current IWC policy regarding allocation and sites
for housing along with the implications for Ryde.
He reported that the IWC had consulted on the original draft of the Island Plan
Review, which planned for some 641 houses per year, although he conceded that
the plan was not well received during consultation. As a result, the IWC is reassessing
the targets, taking into account current Island statistics such as what has been
delivered and what has been built in any given year as opposed to the government
methodology. Whilst such a course of action was unusual, it had been sanctioned by
the government itself and such figures would also need to be robust and deliverable.
Whilst no precise figure was given, the Cabinet Member did advise that it would be
significantly lower than the initial forecast within the first draft of the Plan.
Within the Core Strategy, there was a policy which stated that building could take
place outside the development envelope and he would be keen to remove this
policy completely. It was also noted that as part of the regeneration of the town,
major road improvements should also be achieved.
With regard to the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
(SHLAA),
members were advised that it sets out potential housing sites, not confirmed ones
and that some may never be developed. However the Cabinet Member was of the
belief that there needed to be more public involvement regarding the SHLAA
meetings.
On the issue of the Environment Bill, which was due to come into effect from January
2021, there was some discussion around specific planning applications for any green
field sites. Any future development from January 2021 would need to include a
biodiversity plan from any developer who proposes to build on a green field site which
commits to increasing the biodiversity by 10 percent.
It was noted that regarding the funding of any major road widening works that would
need to be carried out to support a development, such as widening Smallbrook Lane
for the Nicholson Road site, funding would need to be sought from central
government in addition to developers.
Members were very concerned and frustrated that the major infrastructure plan, which
was commissioned by the IWC, had still not been carried out. Furthermore Island
Roads had recommended refusal for the Nicholson Road site owing to road safety
and capacity issues but the application was still approved.
C - 24
Members also noted that Island Roads raised no concerns with regard to the
proposed Puckpool Hill development of 50 houses, and along with the proposed West
Acre Park site, the resulting increase in traffic that would be generated, but
acknowledged that the Mini Roundabout which is on the end of Appley Road next to
Oakfield Primary School as being a dangerous junction. The Mayor therefore
requested that the IWC, as the Highways Authority, needed to robustly challenge
Island Roads on all aspects of road safety.
The Cabinet Member advised that the revised Local Plan had been delayed largely
due to the Covid 19 pandemic and that officer capacity has also delayed the delivery
of the Infrastructure Plan. This meant that it may well not be submitted until the new
administration takes office in May 2021.
On the IOW Member of Parliament’s position on Island housing numbers, the Cabinet
Member agreed with the MP that the Island needed to deliver realistic targets within
the capacity it had. It was also noted that with regard to the national planning reforms
and housing numbers consultations, the IWC had objected to both the proposed
increase in numbers (raising to over 1,000) along with a part of the new reforms which
stated that should a site be agreed as being developable, it would be assumed as
being classed as having outline planning permission.
On the matter of enforcement issues, it was noted that the Cabinet Member had met
with the IWC’s Head of Planning to discuss how to move the matter forward in a more
effective way, using the limited resources it had in order to concentrate on the more
significant and larger cases such as the Royal York Hotel in Ryde.
Following the discussion, the Chair thanked the Cabinet Member for his time in
attending the meeting and answering the various questions put to him.
166/20
MEMBER QUESTIONS
None were received.
167/20
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
The following Planning Applications were then considered by all members of the
committee:
i.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: Barsby Lodge, St Georges Road, Ryde, PO33 3AS
Proposal: Proposed alterations/upgrade to rear extension and veranda to
include terrace over; extension to ground floor decking; proposed external spiral
staircase to form access to 1st floor terrace; alterations to include replacement
windows and air conditioning unit on east façade; replacement porch
Members were advised that there had been two comments from local residents
concerned about the potential noise from an Air Conditioning unit. Whilst this
was not a material consideration, it was noted that this could be rectified in order
to allay any concerns by residents. All plastic window frames were being
replaced with wooden ones.
C - 25
It was also noted that the local ward member had received no objections from
local residents.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
ii.
Parish(es): Ryde, Ward(s): Ryde South
Location: Land Adjacent To 1 Prince Street, Ryde, PO33 2SE
Proposal: Demolition of double garages and construction of a pair of semi-
detached houses
Island Roads had recommended conditional approval as set out in its
submissions to the Planning Authority (IWC). Members were also encouraged
to see development on a brown field site.
RESOLVED:
THAT, subject to the Special Protection Areas (SPA) contribution payment
being made, Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application
iii.
Parish(es): Ryde, Ward(s): Binstead And Fishbourne
Location: Beachwood, Quarr Road, Binstead, PO33 4EL
Proposal: Single storey side extension to provide additional living space and
bedroom accommodation. (revised plans)(readvertised application)
Ryde Town Council had previously objected to this application owing to the
implications for existing trees. Members noted that the IWC Tree officer had still
recommended refusal
A tree report had shown the root area but owing to issues which had hampered
access to the correct documents on the IWC Website, members were unable to
see the report in full.
Members were very frustrated that access to the IWC Planning Website had
been very unreliable owing to IT issues, which was making considered decisions
by the committee difficult as well as hampering the public’s access to important
documents.
RESOLVED:
THAT Ryde Town Council objects to the application, due to the findings
of the Tree Officer. However, should the tree officer later be satisfied that
a solution to his concerns are identified, then Ryde Town Council would
subsequently support the application.
C - 26
The applications below were considered under delegated powers by the Chair and
Planning Clerk and they proposed the following:
i.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde West
Location: 2 Nelson Crescent, Ryde, PO33 3QN
Proposal: Proposed single storey side extension
ii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde North West
Location: Driftwood, Binstead Road, Ryde, PO33 3ND
Proposal: Demolition of attached garage; proposed alterations; two storey side
extension; single storey rear extension; porch
iii.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Ryde South
Location: 4 Swanmore Road, Ryde, PO33 2TF
Proposal: Demolition of conservatory; proposed single storey rear extension
iv.
Parish(es): Ryde Ward(s): Havenstreet, Ashey And Haylands
Location: 59 Colenutts Road, Ryde, PO33 3HS
Proposal: Proposed dormer window on side elevation at 2nd floor level
RESOLVED:
THAT the above four applications were agreed with no objections.
168/20
DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNCIL
Members noted the following decisions.
PLANNING DECISIONS
1. APPLICATIONS APPROVED
i.
Location: 31 West Hill Road, Ryde, PO33 1LG
Proposal: Demolition of conservatory; Proposed alterations and single storey
rear extension including Juliet balcony at first floor level on rear elevation
(revised scheme)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 09/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
ii.
Location: 30 Somerset Road, Ryde, PO33 1BU
Proposal: Proposed rear and side extension including alterations
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde East
Decision Date: 11/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
C - 27
iii.
Location: Palmer House, Castle Street Ryde, PO33 2EE
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 11/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
iv.
Location: 58 Sherbourne Avenue, Ryde, PO33 3PW
Proposal: The Ash tree situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to
near ground level
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde West
Decision Date: 11/11/2020
Tree Decision
v.
Location: 34 & 36 Grasmere Avenue Ryde, PO33 1NU
Proposal: Formation of vehicle crossovers and hardstanding (revised scheme)
(revised plans)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde East
Decision Date: 16/11/2020
Ryde Town Council objects to the application on the following grounds:
a) The application is contrary to Policies SP1 (Spatial Strategy) and DM2
(Design Quality for New Development) of the Island Plan Core Strategy
and the National Planning Policy Framework.
b) The concerns raised by Island Roads have not been addressed by the
applicant.
vi.
Location: 28 Arnold Road, Binstead Ryde, PO33 3RJ
Proposal: Proposed single storey extension; alterations and outbuilding
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 19/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
vii.
Location: Melody 9 Trafalgar Drive, Binstead Ryde, PO33 3QW
Proposal: Proposed alterations and single storey rear extension; loft
conversion.
single storey extension to garage to form workshop
(revised
plans)(readvertised application)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde West
Decision Date: 23/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
C - 28
viii.
Location: Ryde Conservative Club, 8 Lind Street Ryde, PO33 2NQ
Proposal: Variation of condition 2 on P/01224/18 to allow revised internal
layout and omission of garage
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North West
Decision Date: 24/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
ix.
Location: Ryde Conservative Club, 8 Lind Street Ryde, PO33 2NQ
Proposal: Variation of condition 2 on P/01223/18 to allow revised internal
layout and omission of garage
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North West
Decision Date: 24/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
x.
Location: 4 Wykeham Close, Binstead Ryde, PO33 3ST
Proposal: Proposed extension on front elevation and cladding
(revised
scheme)(revised plan)
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 25/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
xi.
Location: 1 Quarr Close Binstead, Ryde, PO33 4EN
Proposal: Tree A oak situated as detailed in the application is to have the
crown lightly reduced Tree B Ash situated as detailed in the application is to
be felled to near ground level. Tree C Ash situated as detailed in the application
is to be felled to near ground level. Tree D Beech situated as detailed in the
application is to be felled to near ground level. Tree E Oak situated as detailed
in the application is to have the dead top removed. Tree F Oak situated as
detailed in the application is to be felled to near ground level. Tree G Ash
situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to near ground level. Tree
H Ash situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to near ground level.
Tree I Ash situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to near ground
level. Tree J Oak situated as detailed in the application is to be felled to near
ground level.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 25/11/2020
Tree Decision
xii.
Proposal: Location: 9 Abbots Close Binstead Ryde, PO33 4EP
Oak tree situated as detailed in the application to be felled to near ground level.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 25/11/2020
Tree Decision
C - 29
xiii.
Proposal:T1 Common ash situated as detailed in the application is to be felled
to near round level.
Location: Land Opposite 72 Mayfield Road Fronting Onto Pell Lane Ryde
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde West
Decision Date: 25/11/2020
Tree Decision
xiv.
Location: The Coach House, 74A West Hill Road, Ryde, PO33 1LW
A1 Willow tree situated as detailed in application to be felled to near ground
level.
Parish: Ryde Ward: Ryde North East
Decision Date: 25/11/2020
Tree Decision
2. APPLICATIONS REFUSED
Location: Flat C Danehurst Pitts Lane Binstead Ryde Isle Of Wight PO33 3SX
Proposal: Listed Building Consent for alterations to internal layout
Parish: Ryde Ward: Binstead And Fishbourne
Decision Date: 09/11/2020
Ryde Town Council raised no objection to the application.
RESOLVED:
THAT the decisions taken by the Isle of Wight Council since the last Ryde
Town Council Planning Committee meeting be noted.
169/20
PLANNING APPLICATION APPEAL
The following planning application appeal was noted:
Location: 3A Nelson Crescent, Ryde, PO33 3QN
Proposal: Proposed removal of existing roof; replacement roof extension to provide
additional living accommodation; rear extension (revised scheme)
170/20
POSITION STATEMENT REVIEW GROUP
The Committee were advised that the scheduled meeting of the Position Statement
Review Group on 7 December 2020 was cancelled owing to staffing issues and would
now take place on Tuesday 15 December 2020 at 2pm. Members would be advised
on any outcomes at the next Planning, Regeneration and Environment Committee
meeting.
C - 30
171/20
PLANNING, REGENERATION AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE BUDGET
Members were presented with the latest 2021 - 2022 Budget proposals for Planning,
Regeneration and Environment.
The Planning Clerk advised members of a proposal for the provision of a road barrier
at the entrance to the Lower High Street Pedestrian Zone at a cost of £10,000 capital
costs with ongoing costs of operating the barrier in the morning and evening. The
ongoing costs were at present unknown, pending further investigation. Such costs
would be over the committee’s delegated spending approval limit and would therefore
need Full Council approval. There may however be options within the High Street
Heritage Action Zone (HSHAZ) fund to meet the barrier costs.
It was noted that the budget for Coronation Gardens had increased to £11,000 to
cover any rises in tarmac costs and that £5,000 was committed from 2020 - 2021 for
the Fiveways Shelter. Planning Enforcement had again been forecast at £5,000
It was proposed that the recommendations were left as tabled, leaving room to be
flexible in looking at possible reductions and helping to keep the precept as low as
possible for 2021 - 2022.
RESOLVED
THAT the Planning, Regeneration and Environment Committee budget be
agreed as tabled.
172/20
DELEGATED DECISIONS OVER THE CHRISTMAS PERIOD
Owing to the Christmas break, it was proposed that any decisions that needed to be
taken between 9 December 2020 and the next scheduled meeting of the Planning,
Regeneration and Environment Committee on 19 January 2021, would be delegated
to the Committee Chair and/or Vice Chair and the Planning Clerk and/or the
Committees and Ryde Place Plan Coordinator. Decisions would be made by means
of email or meeting via the Zoom Video Conferencing platform.
RESOLVED:
THAT all decisions relating to any Planning, Regeneration and Environment
matters which needed to be taken between 9 December 2020 and 18 January
2021 be delegated to the Committee Chair, Vice Chair, Planning Clerk and the
Committees and Ryde Place Plan Coordinator.
173/20
DATE OF NEXT MEETING
RESOLVED:
THAT the next meeting of the Planning, Regeneration and Environment
Committee will be held on Tuesday, 19 January 2021 via the Zoom Video
meeting facility, at 4.00pm.
C - 31
APPENDIX
RYDE TOWN COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
HELD ON 8 DECEMBER 2020
PUBLIC QUESTION - REF 06/20
Question from Mrs Jenny Wade of Ryde Society
When is the Isle of Wight Council going to consider the request sent from Ryde Town Council
on the 3rd December 2019 for a detailed Infrastructure Plan for the whole of Ryde; and
should largescale planning applications continue to be determined when the report from
Island Roads relating to Ryde roads and junctions, commissioned by Chris Ashman (Head
of Regeneration) earlier this year (2020), is still awaited? Is it not the case that without an
adopted blueprint for Ryde infrastructure and expansion, which both Councils and all
developers would be required to work within, there is no formal control over future
development within the Ryde boundary?
RESPONSE
The Chair advised that the question would be covered within the discussions with the Isle of
Wight Councils Cabinet Member for Planning and Housing.
RYDE TOWN COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
HELD ON 8 DECEMBER 2020
PUBLIC QUESTION - REF 07/20
Question from Mr Peter Griffith of Home Consultancy Ltd
Please can you confirm to me how many open market houses and how many affordable
houses have been constructed/built in Ryde since the start of 2012.
In addition could Ryde Town Council and Cllr Abraham provide a view on how many units
they expect to be built on Pennyfeathers and Rosemary Vineyard per year over the next five
years.
RESPONSE
The Chair advised that some of the answers regarding the house numbers constructed since
the start of 2012 can be found within Ryde Town Councils Position Statement. However a
written response would be provided to Mr Griffiths following the meeting.
C - 32
